28/12/2007

We've been saying this for a while!


It seemed quite obvious to us at Leap that the ICT sector is a massive carbon abuser. Businesses say about giving up paper as it saves the environment but the increased demands on bandwith and server use is several times more detrimental to the environment. Alright it saves businesses money on marketing by specifically using the web and it also gives the feel it's not harming the environment, simply because that information to date hasn't been available. But now from one of our clients it is.

An instant counter balance would be to change business electricity use to a 100% renewable electricity tariff and the only true one of those and the only one we'd ever use to date is Good Energy's supply.

matt


The ‘Inefficient Truth’

An Inefficient Truth is the first research report produced by Global Action Plan on behalf of the Environmental IT Leadership Team. The Leadership Team is a unique gathering of major ICT users from a range of different sectors (NHS, John Lewis, Sony etc) who are committed to taking practical action to cut carbon dioxide emissions.

The report contains four sections.

The first section assesses the environmental impact of the ICT sector which is virtually the equivalent of the aviation industry.
Section two analyses survey results from major ICT users and discovers how quickly and effectively the sector is responding to the environmental agenda.
The third section takes a snapshot look at some case studies illustrating how companies are implementing practical solutions that are reducing carbon emissions and saving them money.
Finally, there is a Call to Action from Global Action Plan setting out some of the challenges facing Government, vendors and users in order to move the sector towards a lower carbon future.
An Inefficient Truth is the first part of a longer journey which will see Global Action Plan using its position as an independent practical environmental charity to help cut carbon emissions from the ICT sector. Please contact me for more details on how we are working with the IT industry further.

http://www.globalactionplan.org.uk/event_detail.aspx?eid=ef0cecc6-2621-4a3c-962c-e4758b8952f8 – to download the full report

http://itn.co.uk/news/3bc1df24a662a3db3f3d911a7a83ef32.html - ITN Video coverage

Guardian

http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2007/dec/03/carbonfootprints.carbonemissions?gusrc=rss&feed=technology

The information and communication technology (ICT) sector in the UK has a carbon footprint as big as the aviation industry, according to a report released today.

ICT equipment accounts for 3-4% of the world's carbon emissions, says the report by Global Action Plan, which warns that growth in carbon emissions from the sector is exacerbated by government policies requiring higher levels of data to be stored.

The report found that 61% of data centres only have the capacity for two years of growth and 37% of companies are storing data indefinitely due to government policy.

It also revealed that 86% of ICT departments surveyed did not know the carbon footprint of their activities, 80% of respondents did not believe their company's data policies to be environmentally sustainable, and less than 20% have even seen their energy bills.

The report, An Inefficient Truth, is understood to be the UK's first survey to measure awareness between the use of ICT in business and its contribution to the UK's carbon footprint.

More than 60% of the chief executives, IT director and senior decision makers from 120 UK enterprises which took part in the survey said time pressures and cost were the biggest barriers to adopting sustainable ICT policies. They believed that recognised standards and tax allowances would help the sector to reduce emissions.

Global Action Plan is calling on the government to provide incentives to help companies reduce their ICT carbon footprint and to review its policies on long-term data storage to take into account the carbon implications.

It wants ICT vendors to improve the quality of their environmental information, for ICT departments to be accountable for the energy costs of ICT equipment and for companies to ensure their ICT infrastructure meets stricter efficiency targets.

Trewin Restorick, the director of Global Action Plan and chairman of the environmental IT leadership team, said: "The average server has roughly the same annual carbon footprint as a [sport utility vehicle] doing 15 miles per gallon.

"With carbon footprint now equal to the aviation industry, ICT, and how businesses utlitise ICT, will increasingly come under the spotlight as government seeks to achieve carbon cutting commitments."

He added that ICT departments have been "slow off the mark to address their carbon footprint", but awareness was now growing.

"To turn this into action, ICT departments need help. They need vendors to give them better information rather than selling green froth, [and] they need government policies to become more supportive and less contradictory," said Restorick.

Tom Kelly, the managing director of Logicalis UK - sponsors of the report – said under-utilisation was a prime example of "energy abuse". The report found that almost 40% of servers are underutilised by more than half of their capacity.

He called on business to evaluate the efficiency of existing ICT infrastructure and improve efficiency in order to avoid legislation.

"A flabby business that guzzles budget and energy is likely to be a prime target for impending legislation," said Kelly. "In short, efficient IT equals green IT."

18/12/2007

US pull sucker punch at Bali?

this is from George Monbiot, always worth listening to.

Published on Monday, December 17, 2007 by The Guardian/UK
We’ve Been Suckered Again by the US. So Far the Bali Deal Is Worse than Kyoto
America will keep on wrecking climate talks as long as those with vested interests in oil and gas fund its political system
by George Monbiot

“After 11 days of negotiations, governments have come up with a compromise deal that could even lead to emission increases. The highly compromised political deal is largely attributable to the position of the United States, which was heavily influenced by fossil fuel and automobile industry interests. The failure to reach agreement led to the talks spilling over into an all-night session.”

These are extracts from a press release by Friends of the Earth. So what? Well it was published on December 11 - I mean to say, December 11 1997. The US had just put a wrecking ball through the Kyoto protocol. George Bush was innocent; he was busy executing prisoners in Texas. Its climate negotiators were led by Albert Arnold Gore.

The European Union had asked for greenhouse gas cuts of 15% by 2010. Gore’s team drove them down to 5.2% by 2012. Then the Americans did something worse: they destroyed the whole agreement.

Most of the other governments insisted that the cuts be made at home. But Gore demanded a series of loopholes big enough to drive a Hummer through. The rich nations, he said, should be allowed to buy their cuts from other countries. When he won, the protocol created an exuberant global market in fake emissions cuts. The western nations could buy “hot air” from the former Soviet Union. Because the cuts were made against emissions in 1990, and because industry in that bloc had subsequently collapsed, the former Soviet Union countries would pass well below the bar. Gore’s scam allowed them to sell the gases they weren’t producing to other nations. He also insisted that rich nations could buy nominal cuts from poor ones. Entrepreneurs in India and China have made billions by building factories whose primary purpose is to produce greenhouse gases, so that carbon traders in the rich world will pay to clean them up.

The result of this sabotage is that the market for low-carbon technologies has remained moribund. Without an assured high value for carbon cuts, without any certainty that government policies will be sustained, companies have continued to invest in the safe commercial prospects offered by fossil fuels rather than gamble on a market without an obvious floor.

By ensuring that the rich nations would not make real cuts, Gore also guaranteed that the poor ones scoffed when we asked them to do as we don’t. When George Bush announced, in 2001, that he would not ratify the Kyoto protocol, the world cursed and stamped its foot. But his intransigence affected only the US. Gore’s team ruined it for everyone.

The destructive power of the American delegation is not the only thing that hasn’t changed. After the Kyoto protocol was agreed, the then British environment secretary, John Prescott, announced: “This is a truly historic deal which will help curb the problems of climate change. For the first time it commits developed countries to make legally binding cuts in their emissions.” Ten years later, the current environment secretary, Hilary Benn, told us that “this is an historic breakthrough and a huge step forward. For the first time ever, all the world’s nations have agreed to negotiate on a deal to tackle dangerous climate change.” Do these people have a chip inserted?

In both cases, the US demanded terms that appeared impossible for the other nations to accept. Before Kyoto, the other negotiators flatly rejected Gore’s proposals for emissions trading. So his team threatened to sink the talks. The other nations capitulated, but the US still held out on technicalities until the very last moment, when it suddenly appeared to concede. In 1997 and in 2007 it got the best of both worlds: it wrecked the treaty and was praised for saving it.

Hilary Benn is an idiot. Our diplomats are suckers. American negotiators have pulled the same trick twice, and for the second time our governments have fallen for it.

There are still two years to go, but so far the new agreement is even worse than the Kyoto protocol. It contains no targets and no dates. A new set of guidelines also agreed at Bali extend and strengthen the worst of Gore’s trading scams, the clean development mechanism. Benn and the other dupes are cheering and waving their hats as the train leaves the station at last, having failed to notice that it is travelling in the wrong direction.

Although Gore does a better job of governing now he is out of office, he was no George Bush. He wanted a strong, binding and meaningful protocol, but American politics had made it impossible. In July 1997, the Senate had voted 95-0 to sink any treaty which failed to treat developing countries in the same way as it treated the rich ones. Though they knew this was impossible for developing countries to accept, all the Democrats lined up with all the Republicans. The Clinton administration had proposed a compromise: instead of binding commitments for the developing nations, Gore would demand emissions trading. But even when he succeeded, he announced that “we will not submit this agreement for ratification [in the Senate] until key developing nations participate”. Clinton could thus avoid an unwinnable war.

So why, regardless of the character of its leaders, does the US act this way? Because, like several other modern democracies, it is subject to two great corrupting forces. I have written before about the role of the corporate media - particularly in the US - in downplaying the threat of climate change and demonising anyone who tries to address it. I won’t bore you with it again, except to remark that at 3pm eastern standard time on Saturday, there were 20 news items on the front page of the Fox News website. The climate deal came 20th, after “Bikini-wearing stewardesses sell calendar for charity” and “Florida store sells ‘Santa Hates You’ T-shirt”.

Let us consider instead the other great source of corruption: campaign finance. The Senate rejects effective action on climate change because its members are bought and bound by the companies that stand to lose. When you study the tables showing who gives what to whom, you are struck by two things.

One is the quantity. Since 1990, the energy and natural resources sector - mostly coal, oil, gas, logging and agribusiness - has given $418m to federal politicians in the US. Transport companies have given $355m. The other is the width: the undiscriminating nature of this munificence. The big polluters favour the Republicans, but most of them also fund Democrats. During the 2000 presidential campaign, oil and gas companies lavished money on Bush, but they also gave Gore $142,000, while transport companies gave him $347,000. The whole US political system is in hock to people who put their profits ahead of the biosphere.

So don’t believe all this nonsense about waiting for the next president to sort it out. This is a much bigger problem than George Bush. Yes, he is viscerally opposed to tackling climate change. But viscera don’t have much to do with it. Until the American people confront their political funding system, their politicians will keep speaking from the pocket, not the gut.

George Monbiot is the author of the best selling books The Age of Consent: a manifesto for a new world order and Captive State: the corporate takeover of Britain.

16/12/2007

Marbel Eden Project photoshoot


Ok, so I'm very bias here and perks of our clients made a great opportunity to get my fantastic daughters involved in one of our newest clients projects. The client was Marbel - Beautiful, safe, environmentally friendly and naturally made wooden toys to help your child learn through play. They have a wonderful range of toys and Leap was called in to work on their 2008 showcase catalogue, which will be out in January 2008. With a 3 week turnaround...

As with all our work we are producing the brochure for the first time on 80% recycled stock and we managed to beat the price of the previous brochures virgin stock! And nice vegetable based inks.

Leap also arranged the photo shoot and we pulled in a favour with our old workplace Eden, an ideal setting for a bunch of kids (and some kid like adults) to to a days photo shoot in the Warm Tropic Biome. With the excellent snapping of one of Cornwalls finest photographers Bob Berry. (shot attached is one of Bobs http://www.bbphoto.net/ )

About 30 seconds after this very excitable shot of Bo was taken she came a cropper and tore the skin off her knees. Alas it was then time to whisk her and her sister Gracie away to nursery so Daddy could continue the shoot.

www.marbel.co.uk

more habbits


This ones for my lovely business partner (and girlfriend) Clare. Still don't understand how she beat me - I personally think she's slightly damaging to the environment... well more than I.

matt

15/12/2007

story of stuff


this is long but a great eye opener! ENJOY OR NOT;)


http://www.storyofstuff.com/

12/12/2007

Team Habbits




this could become a really useful tool and I've asked my whole team to create their habbits. Although I'm disappointed that there isn't too much between us on eco levels and there was me thinking I was super green...just shows. Admittedly they could be telling pork pies to get on my happy side:)

Great idea though and interesting to play with, every part of the body, eyes, feet, hands, butt etc represents and environemental aspect, ie food, travel, technology.

Attached are me, Darren our senior creative and Graham who does all the nice (and way over my head) coding.

10/12/2007

Cornwall Sustainability Awards


Wowie,
we won two awards at this years CSA07 held at the wonderful Trebah Gardens. We won the SME and Overall winner categories in which we were up against some mighty fine 'doing the right thing' sustainably active Cornish businesses. And keynote speaker for the awards Charlie Brown, environmental manager for Ikea has asked us to come and see them to talk further, based on hearing our presentation. Which was about how it is so important for design to take it's creative lead with sustainability to help solve climate change and how we do it with Leap.

A big thanks to Claire Wilcox who heads up our operations for taking the time to put a well written entry in.

08/12/2007

Just one choice

Just one choice

In eight days Al Gore is going to address the UN Climate Change Conference in Bali, Indonesia. At his urging, I've signed an important petition showing I support his important call for a visionary treaty to address the climate crisis. I hope you will too.

http://climateprotect.org/standwithal

The world's elected leaders must take the steps necessary to solve global warming. It's not too late. We have the opportunity now to improve the Earth's future for our children, and their children. If we don't act, we will only have ourselves to blame.


Please sign the petition today. Click here

07/12/2007

today

Well it's been a while, and we have as usual lots to tell you but just not today.

Today the team will be attending the Cornwall Sustainability Awards where Leap has been shortlisted for the small business category. It will be a good time for us all to get together and have a breather from our fast paced and currently transient studio. Take some time out, see friends, clients and other business that are pushing their environmental boundaries.

I'll let you know the outcome and I'll also give you an update on Cornwall Design Week, student portfolio clinics, meeting TV presenter of Dumped, Rob Holdway and our plans for the future.


matt

04/11/2007

Climate change lottery ticket

Check this out, it takesa few minutes of your time but its the pure and simple gist of our future and what part we have to play in it.

http://www.slide.com/r/3bwR_kuB4D8I6Nqm56jRxVsdOpE8TM9L

19/10/2007

Contains


Ever thought about the ‘ingredients’ that go into making the stuff you invite into your home?

CONTAINS explores the stories behind the products we use every day – how they’re made, the materials used,
the energy consumed, the miles travelled – in an innovative, inspiring and accessible exhibition that shows
how design can make a difference.

Finding products that are better for you, for others and for the environment can be tricky.
[re]design’s six ‘er’ words are a handy guide to the ways a product can be better… for everybody.

Cleaner...? Products that avoid polluting our air and water.
Closer...? Products that are made locally or made to be loved.
Greener...? Products that use natural, biodegradable materials from well-managed sources.
Lighter...? Products that are more efficient.
Longer...? Products that are built to last.
Recycler...? Products that use materials that are reclaimed or easy to recycle.

CONTAINS houses 100 thought-provoking, sustainable designs from cutting-edge UK designers.
You can find the exhibition in shipping containers at Newcastle’s Monument – you can’t miss it!

CONTAINS
Monument, Grainger Street, Newcastle NE1 5AF
19-28 October 2007

Visit WWW.REDESIGNDESIGN.ORG for more...

13/10/2007

Sunderland creative sustainablility


Leap has been lucky enough to be part of Sunderland Universities A Question of Design which explores the relationship between design and the environment. The event runs from the 8th to 26th of October, Design Centre University of Sunderland and we were very nicely asked to contribute some comments and graphics.

THE EXHIBITION EXPLORES THE ISSUES RELATED TO SUSTAINABILITY IN GRAPHIC DESIGN.

Thank you Donna Barkess of Sunderland University.

Climate recognition with Nobel Peace Prize

Gore and UN panel win Nobel prize

Al Gore's film An Inconvenient Truth was an unlikely box office hit
Climate change campaigner Al Gore and the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change have been jointly awarded the Nobel Peace Prize. The committee cited "their efforts to build up and disseminate knowledge about man-made climate change".

Mr Gore, US vice-president under Bill Clinton, said he was "deeply honoured".

Mr Gore, 59, won an Oscar for his climate change film An Inconvenient Truth while the IPCC is the top authority on global warming.

IPCC chairman Rajendra Pachauri said he was "overwhelmed" by the award.

He told a cheering crowd of colleagues and journalists outside his office in Delhi that he hoped the award would bring a "greater awareness and a sense of urgency" to the fight against global warming.

The Norwegian Nobel Committee said it wanted to bring into sharper focus the "increased danger of violent conflicts and wars, within and between states" posed by climate change.

It highlighted a series of scientific reports issued over the last two decades by the IPCC, which comprises more than 2,000 leading climate change scientists and experts.

The reports had "created an ever-broader informed consensus about the connection between human activities and global warming", the committee said.

Mr Gore was praised as "probably the single individual who has done most to create greater worldwide understanding of the measures that need to be adopted", through his lectures, films and books.

The choice of recipients continues a trend of the Nobel Peace Prize redefining the potential sources of conflict and threats to peace, says the BBC's world affairs correspondent Mike Wooldridge.

'Planetary emergency'

Speaking in Washington, Mr Gore praised the IPCC, "whose members have worked tirelessly and selflessly for many years".


The IPCC chairman said he was overwhelmed and stunned
"We face a true planetary emergency," Mr Gore warned. "It is a moral and spiritual challenge to all of humanity."

He said he would donate his half of the $1.5m prize money to the Alliance for Climate Protection.

Mr Gore's selection has prompted supporters to renew calls for him to stand in next year's US presidential race. Until now, Mr Gore has said he will not run.


INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE (IPCC)
Established in 1988 by the World Meteorological Organisation (WMO) and the United Nations Environment Programme (Unep)
Made up of more than 2,000 leading climate experts
Tasked with assessing scientific data on the risk of human-induced climate change, its potential impacts and options for mitigation
Does not carry out any research of its own
First Assessment Report published in 1990; its Fourth Assessment Report called Climate Change 2007 to be published mid-November

Nobel Peace Prize quiz
Indian's surprise at award

President George W Bush, who defeated Mr Gore in a bitter fight for the presidency in 2000, was "happy" at the "important recognition" for his rival and the IPCC, a White House spokesman said.

However, the president was not about to change his more sceptical stance on global warming to a more "Gore-style" approach, the spokesman said.

The former vice-president has emerged as a leading climate campaigner. His 2006 documentary film, An Inconvenient Truth, was an unlikely box-office hit and won two Oscars - though it was also criticised by a British judge this week for containing nine errors, and for being alarmist.

The IPCC, established in 1988, is tasked with providing policymakers with neutral summaries of the latest expertise on climate change.

The organisation involves hundreds of scientists working to collate and evaluate the work of thousands more.

03/10/2007

Groundswell come out at airport


press release

Major flaws exposed in County Council case for Newquay Airport


The first independent report into the future of Newquay Airport has exposed major flaws in Cornwall County Council’s plans for expansion. It will be personally delivered to the chief executive and leader of Cornwall County Council on Wednesday 3 October 2007.

Groundswell Cornwall, the climate change action group, commissioned the report to test the County Council’s claims that Cornwall’s future development can only be secured by turning the regional airport into an international gateway. The report highlights basic flaws in the County Council’s case.

Spokesperson Oliver Baines OBE says: “This is the first time the County Council’s claims have been challenged. They don’t stand up to scrutiny. Many are hopelessly flimsy. We are calling on the County Council for an immediate public debate on their plans.”

The County Council claims: cheap air travel is here to stay.
Groundswell says: the chance for cheap fuel in the future is nil.

The County Council claims: the wider debate around air travel does not apply to Cornwall.
Groundswell says: it’s cloud cuckoo land to think that Cornwall can insulate itself from global issues.

The County Council claims: flying leaves no more of a carbon footprint than driving a car.
Groundswell says: evidence strongly suggests that air travel is more polluting than any other form of travel.

The County Council claims: the environmental impact of the expansion will be negligible.
Groundswell says: the Council claims a threefold increase in passengers. The environmental impact of this will be huge.

The County Council claims: the airport will break even in 2030
Groundswell says: even if true this prediction would mean that for the next 23 years the continuing losses at the airport would have to be recovered from rate payers, or by cuts in services elsewhere.

The County Council claims: the future prosperity of Cornwall is dependent on the airport.
Groundswell says: The County Council’s case is invariably overstated and the airport makes only a minor contribution to the Cornish economy.


The report has been compiled by Elizabeth Baines, a postgraduate student at Kings College, London, and will be available from www.groundswellcornwall.org

Calling for the public debate are: Oliver Baines, Manda Brookman, Mike Haywood, Matt Hocking, Ian Jones, Lorely Lloyd, Peter MacGregor, Mandy Milano, Lindley Owen, Lindsay Southcombe, Verena Stubbs, Mark Summers, Matthew Trevaskis, Tony Wainwright

www.groundswellcornwall.org


Ends

For further details please contact
Oliver Baines
Tel 01726 882501 mobile 07967 604517 email: oliverbaines@virgin.net
Lindley Owen
Mobile 07855 015050 Email: lindleyowen@hotmail.com
Lorely Lloyd
Email: lorely@transitionfalmouth.org.uk
Elizabeth Baines
Mobile 07828 257670 email: wizbaines@hotmail.com

26/09/2007

UK Top Green Hotels Identified! And 2 are our clients

Read below folks, this is great news and 4 of the hotels are in Cornwall and it shows the qulaity and then environment can meet to create great destinations and experiences.

Also good for Leap is that two of the hotels are our clients. Primrose Valley Hotela nd Bedruthan Steps Hotel where we have been designing a plethora of fun, practical and experimental items. From Shssh - do not disturb signs made form recycled boards to brochures and websites. And even better, we won the GTBS (Green Tourism Business Scheme) account in April which is based in Perth, Scotland. We have been doing a brand tweak, all supporting print based literature signage and web consultation for them.


Keep up the good stuff everyone and well done.

matt



UK hotels deemed to be at the forefront of sustainable tourism have been identified.

A range of independently owned and corporate properties share the honours in the first register of its kind.

The Green Tourism Business Scheme has handed out gold awards to those companies which have demonstrated a firm commitment to safeguarding the environment and promoting sustainable tourism.

The list was compiled by a team of independent assessors who individually verified each establishment's green credentials before granting them the highest possible grading, according to the organisation.

They had to achieve a minimum standard from more than 120 separate measures ranging from best management practice and energy saving to buying local produce and caring for wildlife and the landscape.

Green Tourism Business Scheme director Andrea Nicholas said: "This is more than just a list it is a sign of the future as more people are demanding that hotels have to be environmentally aware.

"Our assessors visited every hotel on the list and verified their claims to be green.

"We are delighted that so many places want to win the highest accolade - a Gold Award, many others have achieved Bronze or Silver. These hotels are pioneering the way."

The Green Tourism Business Scheme was founded in partnership with VisitScotland ten years ago and has more than 1,400 members across the UK.

23/09/2007

design tips

Listed from the Chris Hacker interview...


1) Do we really need it?
2) Is it designed to minimize waste?
3) Can it be smaller or lighter or made of fewer materials?
4) Is it designed to be durable or multifunctional?
5) Does it use renewable resources?
6) Is reuse practical and encouraged?
7) Are the product and packaging refillable, recyclable or repairable?
8) Is it made with post-consumer recycled or reclaimed materials? If so, how much?
9) Are the materials available in a less toxic form?
10) Does it come from a socially and environmentally responsible company?
11) Is it made locally?

18/09/2007

funny thanks


Heh.. I just got sent this from one of our ace clients. It's true Matt's are good for the planet.... please send me any info on bad matt's if there are any!!!



http://www.cstn.org.uk/Page3.asp?id=180

17/09/2007

Office space need

Hello!

Leap needs to relocate to somewhere in or around St Austell with enough space to hold our 6 staff (when they aren't home working). So if any one knows of anywhere please let us know we have up to 6 weeks from now to be re-officed.

thanks
matt

16/09/2007

Go go go

EcoLabs, with the support of London College of Communication,
presents a panel discussion at the London Design Festival 2007:

The Greening of Illustration & Design
6:30pm, 20 September 2007
London College of Communication

How illustrators and designers rise to the challenge of communicating the
most essential messages in an era of environmental crisis is on the agenda
of this cross-disciplinary panel discussion. Moderated by author and event
producer John Thackara.

Confirmed panellists include:
Lloyd Anderson - Science Director, British Council
Sophie Matthews - Designer, Thomas.Matthews
Jody Barton - Illustrator

As creative communicators we are in a position to help to change attitudes
- working towards ultimately changing behaviour patterns, policies and
systems. Here is a challenge for designers and illustrators: visualize a
better low energy future. We used to see visions of the future with jet
packs and monorails. Now we need to mainstream a picture of a more human
sized, earth connected and energy realistic future.

This event marks the launch of EcoLabs, a non-profit ecological literacy
initiative. EcoLabs intends to create a platform for collaborate projects
that use the skills in design to address environmental issues directly.
Founded by graphic designer and design writer Jody Boehnert, EcoLabs is
actively looking for collaborators, members, advisors and trustees.

For tickets please register at: www.eco-labs.org

Tickets cost:
£7 / Students
£10 / NGOs
£15 / Others

It is essential to book your ticket online in advance of the event.

--
Jenny Clarke
--
Marketing Officer
School of Graphic Design
London College of Communication

09/09/2007

virtual tree

can you grow one?

http://www.raiseatree.co.uk/